I'll post the full text segment that I need to post soon. I just need to edit it. It isn't really ready.

 

 

 

Not even a proper draft….

 

Anal:

 

Physical:

 

It is an exit, not an entrance. Poo comes out of there. It is waste management, not recreation. It is unsanitary. Also, I don’t think that is healthy long term for the muscles of the anus, or the lining. I don’t think that the lining of the anus or rectum is 100% adapted to penetrative sex, or ahem friction based sexual activities or any kind. I just don’t think that that part of the body evolved for the purpose of sexual intercourse.

 

 

*

 

Physical abrasion/damage and anal sex: The friction from anal sex or any foreign object inserted into the anus or rectum may break the skin, making it more susceptible to infection. Any kind of trauma to the rectum or anus increases the risk for things like abscesses. And stuff like anal fissures?

 

*

 

Once you push through the anus. You enter the rectum. Which is the repository for stool. And is probably not the place where I wish to place my penis.

 

Anal sex can cause a fair bit of pain in many cases. And can be associated with increased incidence of fecal incontinence.

 

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11588838/

 

Furthermore, aside from anal intercourse, that part of the body (the anus, rectum etc) can suffer from a wide variety of issues that often require medical attention (particularly those that occurs during and after childbirth). Ummm. Things like fecal incontinence and hemorrhoids, and anal fissures are already a significant problem among women. and anal fissures. There are also severe problems that can occur later in life with that part of the body. Just in general. For example, a lot of women over the age of 55 suffer from serious pelvic floor issues, and other issues down there, including the anus/rectum etc.

 

And given how many issues have occurred in women over time, and throughout history. I’m not sure anal is the best and healthiest sexual activity to engage in with a woman.

 

However, the vagina exists. It is pretty close to the anus, and it is highly suitable for a variety of highly enjoyable sexual activities. Furthermore, mouths and hands exist.

 

 

 

Relational/emotional

 

Anal hurts women sometimes/often. Anal sex I mean. And I don’t really want to do something that hurts them. And it is degrading. I don’t know that I want to behave in a degrading manner like this. I’m not sure that I want to have a relationship that involves behaving in a manner that involves sexual cruelty and degradation.

 

And it is gross and degrading. Not just cruel or mean. It is disgusting. Sort of. Bowel movements come out of there? You’re degrading the woman in a way that is unsanitary, and just gross. And you’re getting poo on yourself. I just don’t think it is a good activity from a relational point of view??

 

Perhaps I’d rather have a relationship based on genuine care and concern for the other person?

 

 

Mammalian

 

On a basic animal level. I don’t think it is healthy (psychologically) for a woman to have penises thrust into her anus, and perhaps more importantly, for men to go doing it. There is actually an instinctive revulsion feeling (and/or fear) that goes along with engaging in anal sex. And perhaps we (or I) ought not to blast past that. I can’t explain it.

 

When I first viewed anal sex in pornography, I felt a visceral sense of disgust. I felt sick to my stomach. I was appalled. I think that these feelings of disgust are hardwired and might be there for a reason. I think mammals have it hardwired into them that penetrating the elimination orifice of the female is disgusting. And the female has it hardwired into her that it is wrong, painful and awful. And some sort of violation. To ride roughshod over those feelings of disgust and fear of violation might be a mistake psychologically. Those in built “guard rails” might be there for a reasons.

 

I just don’t think that orifice is built for that (evolved, adapted, designed natural selection etc).

 

 

Conclusion:

 

Ummm. Maybe just not my cup of tea?

 

I feel a slight sense of hesitation when it comes to the idea of normalising anal sex.

 

And personally, it just might not be my cup of tea. There is contact with feces. There is a visceral feeling of disgust. And I think it is gross and degrading in an unsanitary manner.

 

 

 

****

****

 

What do I want?

 

Perhaps the sort of relationships I’d like are those where… You might love, cherish and adore them.

 

Like a friends with benefits type of arrangement where you care deeply about them and for them? Or a partner, girlfriend, wife type of thing.

 

I keep on getting asked… what do you want? And maybe I want good faith relationships based on trust, where you love them, and value them. Where you cherish and adore them. Maybe I don’t want “sin, debauchery and lust”. Maybe I would prefer things like… desire, love and adoration, along with good company and a bit of friendship.

 

Umm. By relationships, I mean things including a friends with benefits type arrangement, or multiple live in girlfriends. Or even just one partner.

 

Ummmmm. I’d like a fair bit of ordinary sex with women (or at least one woman) that I really like and care about?

I do really want women, I just don't see it as sin or debauch??

[A digression: Way back in Khandallah, these guys told me that I needed “sin, debauchery, and lust” but I don’t agree. Firstly, I don’t think that sex is “sinful”. I don’t want “debauchery”. And I prefer the idea of desire to lust.]

 

 

 

 

To debauch is to debase or corrupt through intemperance..

I don't want to corrupt..?

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ummmm. You can ignore the next part??

 

 

 

 

 

// edit.

 

i deleted the image. 

please don't read this segment, I probably should not have posted it. It is a distraction . They asked me to delete

 

but I won't delete it, to delete it is Barbara Streisand effect stuff

***

I put the image back.

***

 

Ummm. This is actually a simple and appropriate Keynesian stimulus policy, it keeps the economy (gdp) propped up by spending money on healthcare and fast food. And the utility these people receive by consuming the fast food one can only presume to be extraordinarily high? Otherwise, why would they (rational economic actors*) do it.

 


*My university issued guidelines prohibit my treating bipoc as anything other than perfectly rational economic actors with full information.



 

 

I kind of want to write a swiftian satire of the "universal prostitutes collective".


The universal prostitutes collective was created as a response to the threat of revolution by the proletariat against global capital and international finance. It is supported the hardware of the military industrial complex of the USA, and the information warfare department of the PRC.

 

Now you can enjoy Sex as a Service, delivered to the comfort of your home while eating franchise fast food, and listening to Taylor Swift. The games are merely a transaction cost.


Please sell your daughters and sisters into prostitution to keep the system afloat, it is the only way to save globalist capitalism. It is literally too big to fail, and there is no alternative (TINA).

 

But I'm not a good writer, sorry

 

****

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Ummmm. Boring stuff incoming: See also the "broken window fallacy". Not all stimulus spending is "high quality spending".

And not all of the "spending that represents and makes up production statistics" that makes it through to be a part of nominal gdp (gross domestic product) is actually high quality spending.

umm. Don't get me wrong, Keynesian stimulus spending is still really good though. Keynes is legit. It is just that the quality of spending matters too.

 

This is regarding the image and text etc, not the prostitutes collective stuff.